draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-03.txt   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04.txt 
Network Working Group R. Austein Network Working Group R. Austein
Internet-Draft Dragon Research Labs Internet-Draft Dragon Research Labs
Intended status: Standards Track October 19, 2015 Intended status: Standards Track April 11, 2016
Expires: April 21, 2016 Expires: October 13, 2016
An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-03 draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04
Abstract Abstract
This note describes a simple out-of-band protocol to ease setup of This note describes a simple out-of-band protocol to ease setup of
the RPKI provisioning and publication protocols between two parties. the RPKI provisioning and publication protocols between two parties.
The protocol is encoded in a small number of XML messages, which can The protocol is encoded in a small number of XML messages, which can
be passed back and forth by any mutually agreeable secure means. be passed back and forth by any mutually agreeable secure means.
This setup protocol is not part of the provisioning or publication This setup protocol is not part of the provisioning or publication
protocol, rather, it is intended to simplify configuration of these protocol, rather, it is intended to simplify configuration of these
skipping to change at page 1, line 38 skipping to change at page 1, line 38
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 21, 2016. This Internet-Draft will expire on October 13, 2016.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License. described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Overview of the BPKI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Overview of the BPKI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Protocol Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Protocol Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Common Protocol Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.1. Common Protocol Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Protocol Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.2. Protocol Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3.1. <child_request/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4.2.1. <child_request/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3.2. <parent_response/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2.2. <parent_response/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3.3. <publisher_request/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.2.3. <publisher_request/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.4. <repository_response/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.2.4. <repository_response/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.4. <authorization/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.3. <authorization/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.5. <error/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.4. <error/> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4. Protocol Walk-Through . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5. Protocol Walk-Through . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Appendix A. RelaxNG Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Appendix A. RelaxNG Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This note describes a small XML-based out-of-band protocol used to This note describes a small XML-based out-of-band protocol used to
set up relationships between parents and children in the RPKI set up relationships between parents and children in the RPKI
provisioning protocol ([RFC6492]) and between publishers and provisioning protocol ([RFC6492]) and between publishers and
repositories in the RPKI publication protocol repositories in the RPKI publication protocol
([I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]). ([I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]).
The basic function of this protocol is public key exchange, in the The basic function of this protocol is public key exchange, in the
skipping to change at page 4, line 31 skipping to change at page 4, line 31
Public Key: [Alice CA Public Key] Public Key: [Alice CA Public Key]
BasicConstraints: cA = TRUE, pathLenConstraint = 0 BasicConstraints: cA = TRUE, pathLenConstraint = 0
Later, when Bob receives a CMS message from Alice, Bob can verify Later, when Bob receives a CMS message from Alice, Bob can verify
this message via a trust chain back to Bob's own trust anchor: this message via a trust chain back to Bob's own trust anchor:
Issuer: CN = Alice CA Issuer: CN = Alice CA
Subject: CN = Alice EE Subject: CN = Alice EE
Public Key: [Alice EE Public Key] Public Key: [Alice EE Public Key]
[[Need some text detailing required and allowed values in the A complete description of the certificates allowed here is beyond the
certificates: 2048-bit RSA, what extensions, .... But once we go scope of this document, as it is determined primarily by what is
there we also have to provide a path for algorithm agility.]] acceptable to the several other protocols for which this protocol is
handling setup. Furthermore, we expect the requirements to change
over time to track changes in cryptographic algorithms, required key
length, and so forth. Finally, since this protocol is restricted to
setting up pairwise relationships, all that's really required is that
the two parties involved in a particular conversation agree on what
constitutes an acceptable certificate.
3. Protocol Elements All of that said, in practice, the certificates currently exchanged
by this protocol at the time this document was written are what a
reader familiar with the technology would probably expect: RSA keys
with lengths in the 2048-4096 bit range, SHA-2 digests, and a few
common X.509v3 extensions (principally Basic Constraints, Authority
Key Identifier, and Subject Key Identifier). Since the most likely
usage is a cross-certification operation in which the recipient
simply extracts the Subject Name and public key after checking the
self-signature and discards the rest of the incoming certificate, the
practical value of esoteric X.509v3 extensions is somewhat limited.
Each message in the protocol is a distinct XML element in the 3. Terminology
"http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/" XML namespace.
3.1. Nomenclature The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
All of the protocols configured by this setup protocol have their own All of the protocols configured by this setup protocol have their own
terminology for their actors, but in the context of this protocol terminology for their actors, but in the context of this protocol
that terminology becomes somewhat confusing. All of the players in that terminology becomes somewhat confusing. All of the players in
this setup protocol issue certificates, are the subjects of other this setup protocol issue certificates, are the subjects of other
certificates, operate servers, and, in most cases, act as clients for certificates, operate servers, and, in most cases, act as clients for
one protocol or another. Therefore, this note uses its own terms for one protocol or another. Therefore, this note uses its own terms for
the actors in this protocol. the actors in this protocol.
Child: An entity acting in the client ("subject") role of the Child: An entity acting in the client ("subject") role of the
skipping to change at page 5, line 19 skipping to change at page 5, line 36
protocol defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]. protocol defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-publication].
Repository: An entity acting in the server role of the publication Repository: An entity acting in the server role of the publication
protocol defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]. protocol defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-publication].
Note that a given entity might act in more than one of these roles; Note that a given entity might act in more than one of these roles;
for example, in one of the simplest cases, the child is the same for example, in one of the simplest cases, the child is the same
entity as the publisher, while the parent is the same entity as the entity as the publisher, while the parent is the same entity as the
repository. repository.
3.2. Common Protocol Elements 4. Protocol Elements
Each message in the protocol is a distinct XML element in the
"http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/" XML namespace.
4.1. Common Protocol Elements
The first XML attribute in each message is a version field. This The first XML attribute in each message is a version field. This
document describes version 1 of the protocol. document describes version 1 of the protocol.
Most messages contain, among other things, a self-signed BPKI X.509 Most messages contain, among other things, a self-signed BPKI X.509
certificate. These certificates are represented as XML elements certificate. These certificates are represented as XML elements
whose text value is the Base64 text encoding the DER representation whose text value is the Base64 text encoding the DER representation
of the X.509 certificate. of the X.509 certificate.
A number of attributes contain "handles". A handle in this protocol A number of attributes contain "handles". A handle in this protocol
is a text string in the US-ASCII character set consisting of letters, is a text string in the US-ASCII character set consisting of letters,
digits, and the special characters "/", "-", and "_". This protocol digits, and the special characters "/", "-", and "_". This protocol
places no special semantics on the structure of these handles, places no special semantics on the structure of these handles,
although implementations might. Handles are protocol elements, not although implementations might. Handles are protocol elements, not
necessarily meaningful to humans, thus the simplicity of a restricted necessarily meaningful to humans, thus the simplicity of a restricted
character set makes more sense than the complex rules which would be character set makes more sense than the complex rules which would be
needed for internationalized text. needed for internationalized text.
3.3. Protocol Messages Most messages allow an optional "tag" attribute. This is an opaque
cookie supplied by the client in a particular exchange and echoed by
the server; the intent is to simplify the process of matching a
response received by the client with an outstanding request.
4.2. Protocol Messages
The core of this protocol consists of four message types, The core of this protocol consists of four message types,
representing the basic request and response semantics needed to representing the basic request and response semantics needed to
configure a RPKI engine to talk to its parent and its repository via configure a RPKI engine to talk to its parent and its repository via
the provisioning and publication protocols, respectively. the provisioning and publication protocols, respectively.
3.3.1. <child_request/> 4.2.1. <child_request/>
The <child_request/> message is an initial setup request from a The <child_request/> message is an initial setup request from a
provisioning protocol child to its provisioning protocol parent. provisioning protocol child to its provisioning protocol parent.
Fields in the <child_request/> message: Fields in the <child_request/> message:
version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This
note describes protocol version 1. note describes protocol version 1.
tag: The child MAY include a "tag" attribute in the request message.
child_handle: The child_handle attribute is what the child calls child_handle: The child_handle attribute is what the child calls
itself. This is just a hint from the child to the parent, the itself. This is just a hint from the child to the parent, the
parent need not honor it. parent need not honor it.
child_bpki_ta: The <child_bpki_ta/> element is the child's BPKI child_bpki_ta: The <child_bpki_ta/> element is the child's BPKI
identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate, encoded in Base64. identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate, encoded in Base64.
This CA certificate will be the issuer of the BPKI EE certificates This CA certificate will be the issuer of the BPKI EE certificates
corresponding to private keys that the child will use when sending corresponding to private keys that the child will use when sending
provisioning protocol messages to the parent. provisioning protocol messages to the parent.
skipping to change at page 6, line 30 skipping to change at page 7, line 16
<child_request <child_request
child_handle="Bob" child_handle="Bob"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<child_bpki_ta> <child_bpki_ta>
R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI= R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI=
</child_bpki_ta> </child_bpki_ta>
</child_request> </child_request>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.3.2. <parent_response/> 4.2.2. <parent_response/>
The <parent_response/> message is a response from a provisioning The <parent_response/> message is a response from a provisioning
protocol parent to a provisioning protocol child that had previously protocol parent to a provisioning protocol child that had previously
sent a <child_request/> message. sent a <child_request/> message.
Fields in the <parent_response/> message: Fields in the <parent_response/> message:
version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This
note describes protocol version 1. note describes protocol version 1.
tag: If the <child_request/> message included a "tag" attribute, the
parent MUST include an identical "tag" attribute in the
<parent_response/> message; if the request did not include a tag
attribute, the response MUST NOT include a tag attribute either.
service_uri: The service_uri attribute contains an HTTP URL that the service_uri: The service_uri attribute contains an HTTP URL that the
child should contact for up-down ([RFC6492]) service. child should contact for up-down ([RFC6492]) service.
child_handle: The child_handle attribute is the parent's name for child_handle: The child_handle attribute is the parent's name for
the child. This might or might not match the child_handle from the child. This MAY match the child_handle from the
the <child_request/> message. If they do not match, the parent <child_request/> message. If they do not match, the parent wins,
wins, because the parent gets to dictate the names in the because the parent gets to dictate the names in the provisioning
provisioning protocol. This value is the sender field in protocol. This value is the sender field in provisioning protocol
provisioning protocol request messages and the recipient field in request messages and the recipient field in provisioning protocol
provisioning protocol response messages. response messages.
parent_handle: The parent_handle attribute is the parent's name for parent_handle: The parent_handle attribute is the parent's name for
itself. This value is the recipient field in provisioning itself. This value is the recipient field in provisioning
protocol request messages and the sender field in provisioning protocol request messages and the sender field in provisioning
protocol response messages. protocol response messages.
parent_bpki_ta: The <parent_bpki_ta/> element is the parent's BPKI parent_bpki_ta: The <parent_bpki_ta/> element is the parent's BPKI
identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate. identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate.
This certificate is the issuer of the BPKI EE certificates This certificate is the issuer of the BPKI EE certificates
skipping to change at page 7, line 33 skipping to change at page 8, line 25
referrer: A referrer attribute, containing the handle by which referrer: A referrer attribute, containing the handle by which
the publication repository knows the parent, the publication repository knows the parent,
contact_uri: An optional contact_uri attribute that the child may contact_uri: An optional contact_uri attribute that the child may
be able to follow for more information, and be able to follow for more information, and
Authorization token: The text of the <referral/> element is the Authorization token: The text of the <referral/> element is the
Base64 encoding of a signed authorization token granting the Base64 encoding of a signed authorization token granting the
child the right to use a portion of the parent's namespace at child the right to use a portion of the parent's namespace at
the publication repository in question. See Section 3.4 for the publication repository in question. See Section 4.3 for
details on the authorization token. details on the authorization token.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<parent_response <parent_response
child_handle="Bob-42" child_handle="Bob-42"
parent_handle="Alice" parent_handle="Alice"
service_uri="http://a.example/up-down/Alice/Bob-42" service_uri="http://a.example/up-down/Alice/Bob-42"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<parent_bpki_ta> <parent_bpki_ta>
skipping to change at page 8, line 21 skipping to change at page 9, line 21
<parent_bpki_ta> <parent_bpki_ta>
R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI= R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI=
</parent_bpki_ta> </parent_bpki_ta>
<referral <referral
referrer="Alice/Bob-42"> referrer="Alice/Bob-42">
R28sIGxlbW1pbmdzLCBnbyE= R28sIGxlbW1pbmdzLCBnbyE=
</referral> </referral>
</parent_response> </parent_response>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.3.3. <publisher_request/> 4.2.3. <publisher_request/>
The <publisher_request/> message is a setup request from a publisher The <publisher_request/> message is a setup request from a publisher
to a repository. to a repository.
Fields in the <publisher_request/> message: Fields in the <publisher_request/> message:
version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This
note describes protocol version 1. note describes protocol version 1.
tag: The publisher MAY include a "tag" attribute in the request
message.
publisher_handle: The publisher_handle attribute is the publisher's publisher_handle: The publisher_handle attribute is the publisher's
name for itself. This is just a hint, the repository need not name for itself. This is just a hint, the repository need not
honor it. honor it.
publisher_bpki_ta: The <publisher_bpki_ta/> element is the publisher_bpki_ta: The <publisher_bpki_ta/> element is the
publisher's BPKI identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate. publisher's BPKI identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate.
This certificate is the issuer of the BPKI EE certificates This certificate is the issuer of the BPKI EE certificates
corresponding to private keys that the publisher will use to sign corresponding to private keys that the publisher will use to sign
publication protocol messages to the repository. publication protocol messages to the repository.
referral: If a <referral/> element is present, it contains: referral: If a <referral/> element is present, it contains:
referrer: A referrer attribute containing the publication handle referrer: A referrer attribute containing the publication handle
of the referring parent, and of the referring parent, and
Authorization token: The text of the <referral/> element is the Authorization token: The text of the <referral/> element is the
Base64 encoding of a signed authorization token granting the Base64 encoding of a signed authorization token granting the
publisher the right to use a portion of its parent's namespace publisher the right to use a portion of its parent's namespace
at this repository. See Section 3.4 for details on the at this repository. See Section 4.3 for details on the
authorization token. authorization token.
These fields are copies of values that a parent provided to the These fields are copies of values that a parent provided to the
child in the <parent_response/> message (see Section 3.3.2). The child in the <parent_response/> message (see Section 4.2.2). The
referrer attribute is present to aid lookup of the corresponding referrer attribute is present to aid lookup of the corresponding
certificate by the repository. Note that the repository operator certificate by the repository. Note that the repository operator
makes the final decision on whether to grant publication service makes the final decision on whether to grant publication service
to the prospective publisher. The <referral/> element just to the prospective publisher. The <referral/> element just
conveys a parent's grant of permission to use a portion of that conveys a parent's grant of permission to use a portion of that
parent's namespace. parent's namespace.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<publisher_request <publisher_request
publisher_handle="Bob" publisher_handle="Bob"
tag="A0001"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<publisher_bpki_ta> <publisher_bpki_ta>
R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI= R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI=
</publisher_bpki_ta> </publisher_bpki_ta>
</publisher_request> </publisher_request>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.3.4. <repository_response/> 4.2.4. <repository_response/>
The <repository_response/> message is a repository's response to a The <repository_response/> message is a repository's response to a
publisher which has previously sent a <publisher_request/> message. publisher which has previously sent a <publisher_request/> message.
Fields in the <repository_response/> message: Fields in the <repository_response/> message:
version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This
note describes protocol version 1. note describes protocol version 1.
tag: If the <publisher_request/> message included a "tag" attribute,
the repository MUST include an identical "tag" attribute in the
<repository_response/> message; if the request did not include a
tag attribute, the response MUST NOT include a tag attribute
either.
service_uri: The service_uri attribute contains an HTTP URL that the service_uri: The service_uri attribute contains an HTTP URL that the
publisher should contact for publication service publisher should contact for publication service
([I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]). ([I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]).
publisher_handle: The publisher_handle attribute is the repository's publisher_handle: The publisher_handle attribute is the repository's
name for the publisher. This may or may not match the name for the publisher. This may or may not match the
publisher_handle attribute in the publisher's <publisher_request/> publisher_handle attribute in the publisher's <publisher_request/>
message. message.
sia_base: The sia_base attribute is the rsync:// URI for the base of sia_base: The sia_base attribute is the rsync:// URI for the base of
skipping to change at page 10, line 11 skipping to change at page 11, line 21
repository_bpki_ta: The <repository_bpki_ta/> element is the repository_bpki_ta: The <repository_bpki_ta/> element is the
repository's BPKI identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate. repository's BPKI identity, a self-signed X.509 BPKI certificate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<repository_response <repository_response
publisher_handle="Alice/Bob-42" publisher_handle="Alice/Bob-42"
rrdp_notification_uri="https://rpki.example/rrdp/notify.xml" rrdp_notification_uri="https://rpki.example/rrdp/notify.xml"
service_uri="http://a.example/publication/Alice/Bob-42" service_uri="http://a.example/publication/Alice/Bob-42"
sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/" sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/"
tag="A0001"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<repository_bpki_ta> <repository_bpki_ta>
WW91IGNhbiBoYWNrIGFueXRoaW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHdpdGggVEVDTyBhbmQgRERU WW91IGNhbiBoYWNrIGFueXRoaW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHdpdGggVEVDTyBhbmQgRERU
</repository_bpki_ta> </repository_bpki_ta>
</repository_response> </repository_response>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.4. <authorization/> 4.3. <authorization/>
The <authorization/> element is a separate message which is signed The <authorization/> element is a separate message which is signed
with CMS, then included as the Base64 content of <referral/> elements with CMS, then included as the Base64 content of <referral/> elements
in other messages. in other messages.
The eContentType for the signed CMS message is id-ct-xml. The eContentType for the signed CMS message is id-ct-xml.
Fields in the <authorization/> element: Fields in the <authorization/> element:
version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This version: The version attribute specifies the protocol version. This
skipping to change at page 11, line 5 skipping to change at page 12, line 14
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<authorization <authorization
authorized_sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/Carol/" authorized_sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/Carol/"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
SSd2ZSBoYWQgZnVuIGJlZm9yZS4gIFRoaXMgaXNuJ3QgaXQu SSd2ZSBoYWQgZnVuIGJlZm9yZS4gIFRoaXMgaXNuJ3QgaXQu
</authorization> </authorization>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3.5. <error/> 4.4. <error/>
The <error/> element is an optional message which can be used in The <error/> element is an optional message which can be used in
response to any of the core protocol messages described in response to any of the core protocol messages described in
Section 3.3. Section 4.2.
Whether an <error/> element is an appropriate way to signal errors Whether an <error/> element is an appropriate way to signal errors
back to the sender of a protocol message depends on details of the back to the sender of a protocol message depends on details of the
implementation which are outside this specification. For example, if implementation which are outside this specification. For example, if
this protocol is embedded in a web portal interface which is designed this protocol is embedded in a web portal interface which is designed
to let a human being upload and download these messages via upload to let a human being upload and download these messages via upload
and download forms, a human-readable error message may be more and download forms, a human-readable error message may be more
appropriate. On the other hand, a portal intended to be driven by a appropriate. On the other hand, a portal intended to be driven by a
robotic client might well want to use an <error/> message to signal robotic client might well want to use an <error/> message to signal
errors. Similar arguments apply to non-web encapsulations (email, errors. Similar arguments apply to non-web encapsulations (email,
skipping to change at page 12, line 19 skipping to change at page 13, line 19
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<child_request <child_request
child_handle="Carol"> child_handle="Carol">
<child_bpki_ta> <child_bpki_ta>
SSd2ZSBoYWQgZnVuIGJlZm9yZS4gIFRoaXMgaXNuJ3QgaXQu SSd2ZSBoYWQgZnVuIGJlZm9yZS4gIFRoaXMgaXNuJ3QgaXQu
</child_bpki_ta> </child_bpki_ta>
</child_request> </child_request>
</error> </error>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Protocol Walk-Through 5. Protocol Walk-Through
This section walks through a few simple examples of the protocol in This section walks through a few simple examples of the protocol in
use, and stars our old friends, Alice, Bob, and Carol. In this use, and stars our old friends, Alice, Bob, and Carol. In this
example, Alice is the root of a RPKI tree, Bob wants to get address example, Alice is the root of a RPKI tree, Bob wants to get address
and ASN resources from Alice, and Carol wants to get some of those and ASN resources from Alice, and Carol wants to get some of those
resources in turn from Bob. Alice offers publication service, which resources in turn from Bob. Alice offers publication service, which
is used by all three. is used by all three.
Alice, Bob, and Carol each generates his or her own self-signed BPKI Alice, Bob, and Carol each generates his or her own self-signed BPKI
certificate. certificate.
skipping to change at page 13, line 37 skipping to change at page 14, line 37
Bob receives Alice's <parent_response/> and extracts the fields Bob's Bob receives Alice's <parent_response/> and extracts the fields Bob's
RPKI engine will need to know about (child_handle, parent_handle, RPKI engine will need to know about (child_handle, parent_handle,
service_uri, and <parent_bpki_ta/>). Bob also sees the repository service_uri, and <parent_bpki_ta/>). Bob also sees the repository
offer, decides to take Alice up on this offer, and constructs a offer, decides to take Alice up on this offer, and constructs a
<publisher_request/> message accordingly: <publisher_request/> message accordingly:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<publisher_request <publisher_request
publisher_handle="Bob" publisher_handle="Bob"
tag="A0001"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<publisher_bpki_ta> <publisher_bpki_ta>
R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI= R29kIGlzIHJlYWwgdW5sZXNzIGRlY2xhcmVkIGludGVnZXI=
</publisher_bpki_ta> </publisher_bpki_ta>
</publisher_request> </publisher_request>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Alice receives Bob's request to use Alice's publication service, Alice receives Bob's request to use Alice's publication service,
decides to honor the offer she made, and sends back a decides to honor the offer she made, and sends back a
skipping to change at page 14, line 13 skipping to change at page 15, line 13
own publication space, so that relying parties who rsync her products own publication space, so that relying parties who rsync her products
will pick up Bob's products automatically without needing an will pick up Bob's products automatically without needing an
additional fetch operation. additional fetch operation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<repository_response <repository_response
publisher_handle="Alice/Bob-42" publisher_handle="Alice/Bob-42"
rrdp_notification_uri="https://rpki.example/rrdp/notify.xml" rrdp_notification_uri="https://rpki.example/rrdp/notify.xml"
service_uri="http://a.example/publication/Alice/Bob-42" service_uri="http://a.example/publication/Alice/Bob-42"
sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/" sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/"
tag="A0001"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<repository_bpki_ta> <repository_bpki_ta>
WW91IGNhbiBoYWNrIGFueXRoaW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHdpdGggVEVDTyBhbmQgRERU WW91IGNhbiBoYWNrIGFueXRoaW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHdpdGggVEVDTyBhbmQgRERU
</repository_bpki_ta> </repository_bpki_ta>
</repository_response> </repository_response>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob should now have everything he needs to talk to Alice both for Bob should now have everything he needs to talk to Alice both for
provisioning and for publication. provisioning and for publication.
skipping to change at page 16, line 8 skipping to change at page 17, line 8
Carol, not wanting to have to run a publication service, presents Carol, not wanting to have to run a publication service, presents
Bob's referral to Alice in the hope that Alice will let Carol use Bob's referral to Alice in the hope that Alice will let Carol use
Alice's publication service. So Carol constructs a Alice's publication service. So Carol constructs a
<publisher_request/> message including the referral information <publisher_request/> message including the referral information
received from Bob, and sends it all to Alice: received from Bob, and sends it all to Alice:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<publisher_request <publisher_request
publisher_handle="Carol" publisher_handle="Carol"
tag="A0002"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<publisher_bpki_ta> <publisher_bpki_ta>
SSd2ZSBoYWQgZnVuIGJlZm9yZS4gIFRoaXMgaXNuJ3QgaXQu SSd2ZSBoYWQgZnVuIGJlZm9yZS4gIFRoaXMgaXNuJ3QgaXQu
</publisher_bpki_ta> </publisher_bpki_ta>
<referral <referral
referrer="Alice/Bob-42"> referrer="Alice/Bob-42">
R28sIGxlbW1pbmdzLCBnbyE= R28sIGxlbW1pbmdzLCBnbyE=
</referral> </referral>
</publisher_request> </publisher_request>
skipping to change at page 16, line 33 skipping to change at page 17, line 34
willing to let Carol use a portion of Bob's namespace. Given this, willing to let Carol use a portion of Bob's namespace. Given this,
Alice is willing to provide publication service to Carol in the Alice is willing to provide publication service to Carol in the
subtree allocated by Bob for this purpose, so Alice sends back a subtree allocated by Bob for this purpose, so Alice sends back a
<repository_response/>: <repository_response/>:
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<repository_response <repository_response
publisher_handle="Alice/Bob-42/Carol" publisher_handle="Alice/Bob-42/Carol"
service_uri="http://a.example/publication/Alice/Bob-42/Carol" service_uri="http://a.example/publication/Alice/Bob-42/Carol"
sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/Carol/" sia_base="rsync://a.example/rpki/Alice/Bob-42/Carol/"
tag="A0002"
version="1" version="1"
xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"> xmlns="http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/">
<repository_bpki_ta> <repository_bpki_ta>
WW91IGNhbiBoYWNrIGFueXRoaW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHdpdGggVEVDTyBhbmQgRERU WW91IGNhbiBoYWNrIGFueXRoaW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHdpdGggVEVDTyBhbmQgRERU
</repository_bpki_ta> </repository_bpki_ta>
</repository_response> </repository_response>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Once Carol receives this response, Carol should be good to go. Once Carol receives this response, Carol should be good to go.
In theory the publication referral mechanism can extend indefinitely In theory the publication referral mechanism can extend indefinitely
(for example, Carol can refer her child Dave to Alice for publication (for example, Carol can refer her child Dave to Alice for publication
service and it should all work). In practice, this has not yet been service and it should all work). In practice, this has not yet been
implemented, much less tested. In order to keep the protocol implemented, much less tested. In order to keep the protocol
relatively simple, we've deliberately ignored perverse cases such as relatively simple, we've deliberately ignored perverse cases such as
Bob being willing to refer Carol to Alice but not wanting Carol to be Bob being willing to refer Carol to Alice but not wanting Carol to be
allowed to refer Dave to Alice. allowed to refer Dave to Alice.
5. IANA Considerations 6. IANA Considerations
Blah. This document makes no request of IANA.
6. Security Considerations 7. Security Considerations
As stated in Section 1, the basic function of this protocol is an As stated in Section 1, the basic function of this protocol is an
exchange of public keys to be used as BPKI trust anchors. Integrity exchange of public keys to be used as BPKI trust anchors. Integrity
and authentication of these exchanges MUST be ensured via external and authentication of these exchanges MUST be ensured via external
mechanisms deliberately left unspecified in this protocol. mechanisms deliberately left unspecified in this protocol.
7. Acknowledgements 8. Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank: Byron Ellacott, George Michaelson, The author would like to thank: Byron Ellacott, George Michaelson,
Leif Johansson, Matsuzaki Yoshinobu, Michael Elkins, Randy Bush, Leif Johansson, Matsuzaki Yoshinobu, Michael Elkins, Randy Bush,
Seiichi Kawamura, Tim Bruijnzeels, and anybody else who helped along Seiichi Kawamura, Tim Bruijnzeels, and anybody else who helped along
the way whose name the author has temporarily forgotten. the way but whose name the author has temporarily forgotten.
8. Normative References 9. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-sidr-delta-protocol] [I-D.ietf-sidr-delta-protocol]
Bruijnzeels, T., Muravskiy, O., Weber, B., Austein, R., Bruijnzeels, T., Muravskiy, O., Weber, B., Austein, R.,
and D. Mandelberg, "RPKI Repository Delta Protocol", and D. Mandelberg, "RPKI Repository Delta Protocol",
draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-01 (work in progress), draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-02 (work in progress),
October 2015. March 2016.
[I-D.ietf-sidr-publication] [I-D.ietf-sidr-publication]
Weiler, S., Sonalker, A., and R. Austein, "A Publication Weiler, S., Sonalker, A., and R. Austein, "A Publication
Protocol for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure Protocol for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure
(RPKI)", draft-ietf-sidr-publication-07 (work in (RPKI)", draft-ietf-sidr-publication-08 (work in
progress), September 2015. progress), March 2016.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", RFC 2119, BCP 14, March 1997.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., [RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008. (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008.
[RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC [RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)",
5652, STD 70, September 2009. RFC 5652, STD 70, September 2009.
[RFC6492] Huston, G., Loomans, R., Ellacott, B., and R. Austein, "A [RFC6492] Huston, G., Loomans, R., Ellacott, B., and R. Austein, "A
Protocol for Provisioning Resource Certificates", RFC Protocol for Provisioning Resource Certificates",
6492, February 2012. RFC 6492, February 2012.
Appendix A. RelaxNG Schema Appendix A. RelaxNG Schema
Here is a RelaxNG schema describing the protocol elements. Here is a RelaxNG schema describing the protocol elements.
# $Id: rpki-setup.rnc 3429 2015-10-14 23:46:50Z sra $ # $Id: rpki-setup.rnc 3618 2016-04-11 21:19:50Z sra $
default namespace = "http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/" default namespace = "http://www.hactrn.net/uris/rpki/rpki-setup/"
version = "1" version = "1"
base64 = xsd:base64Binary { maxLength="512000" } base64 = xsd:base64Binary { maxLength="512000" }
handle = xsd:string { maxLength="255" pattern="[\-_A-Za-z0-9/]*" } handle = xsd:string { maxLength="255" pattern="[\-_A-Za-z0-9/]*" }
uri = xsd:anyURI { maxLength="4096" } uri = xsd:anyURI { maxLength="4096" }
any = element * { attribute * { text }*, ( any | text )* } any = element * { attribute * { text }*, ( any | text )* }
tag = xsd:token { maxLength="1024" }
authorization_token = base64 authorization_token = base64
bpki_ta = base64 bpki_ta = base64
start |= element child_request { start |= element child_request {
attribute version { version }, attribute version { version },
attribute child_handle { handle }, attribute child_handle { handle },
attribute tag { tag }?,
element child_bpki_ta { bpki_ta } element child_bpki_ta { bpki_ta }
} }
start |= element parent_response { start |= element parent_response {
attribute version { version }, attribute version { version },
attribute service_uri { uri }, attribute service_uri { uri },
attribute child_handle { handle }, attribute child_handle { handle },
attribute parent_handle { handle }, attribute parent_handle { handle },
attribute tag { tag }?,
element parent_bpki_ta { bpki_ta }, element parent_bpki_ta { bpki_ta },
element offer { empty }?, element offer { empty }?,
element referral { element referral {
attribute referrer { handle }, attribute referrer { handle },
attribute contact_uri { uri }?, attribute contact_uri { uri }?,
authorization_token authorization_token
}* }*
} }
start |= element publisher_request { start |= element publisher_request {
attribute version { version }, attribute version { version },
attribute publisher_handle { handle }, attribute publisher_handle { handle },
attribute tag { tag }?,
element publisher_bpki_ta { bpki_ta }, element publisher_bpki_ta { bpki_ta },
element referral { element referral {
attribute referrer { handle }, attribute referrer { handle },
authorization_token authorization_token
}* }*
} }
start |= element repository_response { start |= element repository_response {
attribute version { version }, attribute version { version },
attribute service_uri { uri }, attribute service_uri { uri },
attribute publisher_handle { handle }, attribute publisher_handle { handle },
attribute sia_base { uri }, attribute sia_base { uri },
attribute rrdp_notification_uri { uri }?, attribute rrdp_notification_uri { uri }?,
attribute tag { tag }?,
element repository_bpki_ta { bpki_ta } element repository_bpki_ta { bpki_ta }
} }
start |= element authorization { start |= element authorization {
attribute version { version }, attribute version { version },
attribute authorized_sia_base { uri }, attribute authorized_sia_base { uri },
bpki_ta bpki_ta
} }
start |= element error { start |= element error {
 End of changes. 50 change blocks. 
63 lines changed or deleted 120 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/